What It’s Really About
Well, it’s all about Salmond, isn’t it? The question on the
ballot paper is: Do you want Alex Salmond to be the king of Scotland .
Forever.
Except it’s not. It absolutely is not. The question is
simple: Should Scotland be an independent country?
In the event of a YES vote, would that make Alex Salmond
happy? Yes, of course – it’s what he’s campaigned for all his life. Would it
make him the leader of Scotland ,
in any capacity, after 2016? Only if enough people voted for him. In other
words, it would be up to you, the Scottish voters.
Is your hatred of one man, and the fact that something you
do could result in him getting something he wants, worth giving up the chance
of taking control of our own finances, making our decisions for our own people,
having a vote that actually matters rather than one that only gets us the
government we vote for if it just so happens that enough people in England want
the same as us?
That’s for your conscience. If personality is more important
to you than policy, then you’ll stick to your guns and be very pleased at
having thwarted one man, ignoring the fact that you have also thwarted a nation’s
chance at self-determination and self-rule. But so long as that wee fat Alex
isn’t smiling, eh?
Lots of people talk of the uncertainty, not knowing what Scotland
would be like if they vote YES, exactly which currency, exactly who’d end up as
the leader. And so, they reason, it’s safer to stay with what they know, with
certainties.
But there are no certainties. No one can tell you who will
be in charge of the main UK
political parties in 2015, which of those parties will win the election, which
of the policies in their manifestos they will actually keep. We’ve been
promised more powers if we vote NO (by parties who vetoed devo-max on the ballot paper), but we’re not to be told what those powers
are, just as we’re not allowed to negotiate any details of an independent Scotland before
the referendum. We are expected to just wait and see. Uncertainty is rife no
matter which way you vote.
And please remember that voting NO isn’t just voting against
something – it’s also voting for something. It’s voting for Westminster to continue its control over
these aspects of our lives:
benefits and social security
benefits and social security
immigration
defence
foreign policy
employment
broadcasting
trade and industry
nuclear energy, oil, coal, gas and electricity
consumer rights
data protection
the Constitution (the UK doesn’t actually have one of
these, so I’ve never quite understood that, but it’s what’s on the government’s
website, so I included it here)
I see those as quite important. All the more so since the
recent attacks on the poor and disabled through ‘restructuring’ of benefits.
All the more so since the slide to the right that’s taking place in the UK at
the moment. All the more so since more and more information comes to light about
how much we’ve been lied to, and are still being lied to, about oil and gas.
No one can force people to look at issues rather than
people. I could just be petty and say, ‘Oh, well, if a YES vote is a vote for
Alex Salmond, then a NO vote is a vote for David Cameron.’ But that would be
silly. This is not about either of them – it’s not about Lamont or Darling or
Davidson or Miliband or Clegg either
A YES vote is to give Scotland complete control over its
own finances and its own affairs. A NO vote is to leave some of that control in
the hands of whichever Westminster
party the majority of English people vote for.
For me, it’s that simple.
Nose, your, to, face, spite, cut, don't, your, off. Arrange these words into a sentence that makes sense.
ReplyDeleteAye, and that poll of women voters - so many saying don't like Salmond, he's arrogant etc. This is what Mrs Pankhurst fought for - so we could treat politics like a quiz in Heat or Hello.
ReplyDelete